🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, public demonstration is no longer a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a privilege that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This constitutes the underlying meaning of new regulations that the current government is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can occur, with potential prison sentences for those who disobey these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement sweeping new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Suppression

The latest limitations are being justified by citing last week's terrible antisemitic attack on a British Islamic center. There should be widespread consensus that the security of Jewish communities in Britain must be safeguarded. However, employing this horrific incident as a justification to stifle opposition is not only unrelated to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't draw the line at mass killing, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," observed a prominent American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Perspective of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as extremists in their time, even while they were fighting for the rights of marginalized groups.

Current Reality

In the current complicated landscape, here's what's actually occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is perpetrating what United Nations investigations have characterized as genocide. Its warfare have led the International Criminal Court to release legal indictments against Benjamin Netanyahu and his ex-military leader.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's violent actions. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on arms sales to the state, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially lost the public debate, pro-Israel advocates are now exploiting a vile antisemitic crime to attempt to silence a popular campaign against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made genuinely hateful statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement minimal reason to take action.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The standard interpretation of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly questioned for potentially stifling valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've reached a situation where police authorities can suggest that demonstrations criticizing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, government officials have stated that acknowledgment of Palestine as a nation has made political parties "implicated" in supposed mistreatment experienced by British Jews.

Inconsistent Treatment

On the same day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the horrific toll from 24 months of daily atrocities that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of racism in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a concerning boundary by proscribing a specific activist group, a non-violent, anti-genocide activist collective. Thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for holding signs against genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the child of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's not difficult to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the authoritarian crackdown on such demonstrations – and on freedom of expression in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted extensive authority to suppress opposition. What might a new administration do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our liberties. We may eventually rue how easily we permitted them to slip away.